DSpace Repository

Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic [electronic resource] / edited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Armgardt, Matthias. editor.
dc.contributor.author Canivez, Patrice. editor.
dc.contributor.author Chassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine. editor.
dc.contributor.author SpringerLink (Online service)
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-30T22:01:19Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-30T22:01:19Z
dc.date.created 2015.
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.isbn 9783319160214
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.conacyt.gov.py/xmlui/handle/123456789/13161
dc.description XI, 270 p. 34 illus.
dc.description.abstract This volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective.  The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jørgensen´s Dilemma, the Rhetor´s Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions, and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions.   The contributions in this work constitute the first results of the ANR-DFG joint research project “JuriLog” (Jurisprudence and Logic), which aims at fostering the cooperation between legal scholars and philosophers.  On the one hand, lawyers and legal scholars have an interest in emphasizing the logical character of legal reasoning. In this respect, the present enquiry examines the question of how logic, especially newer forms of dialogical logic, can be made fruitful as a significant area of philosophy for jurisprudence and legal practice. On the other hand, logicians find in legal reasoning a striving towards clear definitions and inference-procedures that is relevant to their discipline. In order to fully understand such reciprocal relationships, it is necessary to bridge the gap between law, logic and philosophy in contemporary academic research. The essays collected in this volume all work towards this common goal.   The book is divided in three sections. In the first part, the strong relation between Roman Law and logic is explored with respect to the analysis of disjunctive statements in legal acts. The second part focuses on Leibniz´s legal theory. The third part, finally, is dedicated to current interactions between law and logic.
dc.description.tableofcontents General Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hülser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor’s Dilemma: Leibniz’s Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz’s Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d´Entreprise); Juliette Sénéchal.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2015.
dc.relation.ispartofseries Springer eBooks
dc.relation.ispartofseries Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2214-9120 ; 7
dc.relation.ispartofseries Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2214-9120 ; 7
dc.relation.uri http://cicco.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4
dc.subject Philosophy.
dc.subject Logic.
dc.subject Political science.
dc.subject Applied linguistics.
dc.subject Law Philosophy.
dc.subject Law.
dc.subject Sociology.
dc.subject Philosophy.
dc.subject Philosophy of Law.
dc.subject Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
dc.subject Logic.
dc.subject Applied Linguistics.
dc.subject Knowledge - Discourse.
dc.subject.ddc 340.1 23
dc.subject.lcc B65
dc.subject.other Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
dc.title Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic [electronic resource] / edited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.
dc.type text
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4
dc.identifier.bib 978-3-319-16021-4
dc.format.rdamedia computer
dc.format.rdacarrier online resource
dc.format.rda text file PDF


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account